Ten minutes into my divorce trial, my husband laughed at me in front of a packed Atlanta courtroom.<\/p>\n
My name is Victoria Hayes. I was thirty-nine years old, the founder of a successful logistics technology company valued at approximately $12 million, and the daughter of a man who had taught me that money could buy comfort but never integrity.<\/p>\n
My husband, Richard Hayes, was a prominent attorney who had spent fifteen years building a reputation as a brilliant negotiator.<\/p>\n
Unfortunately, he had mistaken my quiet nature for weakness.<\/p>\n
\u201cYour Honor,\u201d Richard announced, straightening his expensive suit, \u201cmy wife has spent years benefiting from assets accumulated during our marriage. I am requesting an equitable share of her company, along with access to the family trust established by her late father.\u201d<\/p>\n
He paused and smiled at me.<\/p>\n
\u201cAfter all, marriage is a partnership. She cannot simply walk away with everything.\u201d<\/p>\n
Behind him sat my mother, Eleanor, and my younger sister, Madison.<\/p>\n
Both were smiling.<\/p>\n
They believed the case was already won.<\/p>\n
For months, they had assured Richard that I would eventually surrender rather than expose our family’s private affairs in public. My mother had even told several relatives that I was emotionally unstable and incapable of managing my own finances.<\/p>\n
Richard had repeated those claims in his filings.<\/p>\n
What he hadn’t mentioned was that he had been having an affair with Madison’s best friend, Lauren, for almost a year.<\/p>\n
Nor had he mentioned the financial arrangements he had made with my mother and sister while preparing his divorce strategy.<\/p>\n
They believed I knew only about the affair.<\/p>\n
They were wrong.<\/p>\n
For eleven months, I had quietly gathered records, consulted independent attorneys, and documented transactions that raised serious questions about what Richard and my family had been doing behind my back.<\/p>\n
I had not come to court to embarrass them.<\/p>\n
I had come to protect what was mine.<\/p>\n
And I had brought proof that their story was not the whole story.<\/p>\n
Richard and I met at a charity fundraiser when I was twenty-six.<\/p>\n
At the time, I was working out of a small office above a shipping warehouse, trying to turn an idea into a business. My company developed software that helped regional distributors coordinate deliveries, track inventory, and reduce transportation costs.<\/p>\n
Richard admired my ambition.<\/p>\n
At least, that was what I believed.<\/p>\n
He was charming, confident, and persuasive. He encouraged me to expand, introduced me to investors, and helped review some early contracts.<\/p>\n
When we married three years later, I believed I had found a partner who respected both my independence and my dreams.<\/p>\n
My company grew faster than either of us expected.<\/p>\n
Within a decade, we had customers across several states, a team of more than a hundred employees, and a valuation in the millions.<\/p>\n
My father, Thomas Bennett, had been proud of me long before the business became successful. Before he died, he established a family trust containing assets he had accumulated during his lifetime. He worked with independent estate-planning professionals to structure it so that my inheritance would be managed according to the trust’s terms.<\/p>\n
He had one particular concern.<\/p>\n
He worried that people might confuse my success with an invitation to control me.<\/p>\n
\u201cNever sign anything just because someone you love tells you to,\u201d he once warned me. \u201cRead it. Understand it. And if you don’t understand it, find someone who isn’t benefiting from your signature.\u201d<\/p>\n
I remembered those words years later, when Richard began asking increasingly detailed questions about my company and my inheritance.<\/p>\n
At first, I thought he was simply curious.<\/p>\n
Then he started asking whether the trust could be reorganized, whether company shares could be transferred to a joint holding company, and whether I had considered appointing him as a financial adviser.<\/p>\n
I declined.<\/p>\n
Richard smiled and told me I was being overly cautious.<\/p>\n
My mother disagreed.<\/p>\n
\u201cYour husband is a lawyer, Victoria. Why wouldn’t you trust him?\u201d<\/p>\n
My sister Madison was even more direct.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou act as though everyone is trying to steal from you.\u201d<\/p>\n
I stopped discussing my finances with them.<\/p>\n
I thought that would end the problem.<\/p>\n
Instead, it seemed to make them more determined to gain access.<\/p>\n
I discovered Richard’s affair by accident.<\/p>\n
One evening, he left his tablet on the kitchen counter while he showered. A message appeared on the screen.<\/p>\n
I can’t wait until this is over. Then we can finally stop pretending.<\/p>\n
The sender was Lauren Mitchell, Madison’s closest friend since college.<\/p>\n
I stared at the message for nearly a minute.<\/p>\n
Then another arrived.<\/p>\n
Your wife still believes you’re working late. I almost feel sorry for her.<\/p>\n
I felt sick.<\/p>\n
I did not open the device or search through his private messages. I took a screenshot of the notification that had appeared on the screen I could already see, then walked away.<\/p>\n
The following morning, I asked Richard whether there was someone else.<\/p>\n
He didn’t look surprised.<\/p>\n
He looked annoyed.<\/p>\n
\u201cIs this what we’re doing now?\u201d he asked. \u201cAccusing each other of things because you’re unhappy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI’m asking you a question.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd I’m telling you that your suspicions are becoming exhausting.\u201d<\/p>\n
Two weeks later, he announced that he wanted a divorce.<\/p>\n
He claimed we had grown apart and that the marriage had become impossible to repair.<\/p>\n
I suspected the affair, but I had no desire to spend my life trying to force someone to love me.<\/p>\n
I agreed to separate.<\/p>\n
Then Richard told me what he wanted.<\/p>\n
Half my company.<\/p>\n
A share of the assets he claimed were connected to our marriage.<\/p>\n
And access to my father’s trust.<\/p>\n
When I reminded him that the trust had been established by my father and that its terms needed to be examined independently, he laughed.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou don’t get to decide what is marital property just because you put the word ‘trust’ on it.\u201d<\/p>\n
He was correct about one thing: the legal treatment of assets in a divorce depends on the facts, applicable law, and the structure of the trust.<\/p>\n
But he was wrong to assume that his demands automatically gave him rights to those assets.<\/p>\n
I hired an independent family-law attorney named Amelia Grant.<\/p>\n
She reviewed the trust documents, the company’s formation records, the timing of my ownership, and our financial history.<\/p>\n
Her advice was straightforward.<\/p>\n
\u201cDon’t make assumptions,\u201d she told me. \u201cDon’t hide anything. Don’t sign anything under pressure. And don’t confuse what he demands with what the court will award.\u201d<\/p>\n
For the first time in months, I felt as though someone was looking at the situation objectively.<\/p>\n
Then Amelia discovered the first troubling discrepancy.<\/p>\n
Richard had claimed that he had made substantial financial contributions to my company during our marriage.<\/p>\n
But the documents he submitted did not clearly support the amount he was demanding.<\/p>\n
Several transfers were described as loans in one record and as consulting payments in another. A company connected to my mother had received money from an account associated with our household expenses. Some payments were later described as reimbursements, but the supporting documentation was incomplete.<\/p>\n
None of those entries alone proved wrongdoing.<\/p>\n
Together, however, they raised enough questions to justify a deeper review.<\/p>\n
Amelia brought in an independent forensic accountant.<\/p>\n
We examined company records, bank statements available to me, contracts, emails I had lawfully retained, and documents produced through the legal process.<\/p>\n
A pattern began to emerge.<\/p>\n
Richard had been sharing financial information with my mother. Madison had encouraged me to sign documents that would have transferred certain management rights to a company Richard proposed creating. Lauren had also been involved in discussions about a consulting arrangement connected to that proposed company.<\/p>\n
The arrangement had never been fully implemented.<\/p>\n
But the records suggested that they had been planning for it to become part of Richard’s financial strategy.<\/p>\n
Then we found a draft agreement.<\/p>\n
It proposed that Richard receive a substantial ownership interest in a new entity that would hold certain business assets. A separate schedule referred to my father’s trust as a potential source of collateral.<\/p>\n
My signature appeared on one preliminary page.<\/p>\n
I had never signed it.<\/p>\n
The signature looked similar to mine, but it was not mine.<\/p>\n
Amelia warned me not to jump to conclusions.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe need to establish who prepared this, how it was circulated, and whether anyone actually relied on it,\u201d she said. \u201cA signature discrepancy is serious, but we need evidence before accusing a specific person of forgery.\u201d<\/p>\n
We preserved the document and provided it to the appropriate experts for examination.<\/p>\n
As the investigation continued, we found messages indicating that Richard had discussed using the proposed arrangement to strengthen his position in the divorce.<\/p>\n
In one exchange, he wrote that once the company assets were placed under the new entity, it would be harder for me to keep them separate from the marital negotiations.<\/p>\n
Another message from my mother said:<\/p>\n
Victoria always gives in when the pressure gets high enough. Keep pushing.<\/p>\n
I read that sentence over and over.<\/p>\n
My own mother had been helping my husband pressure me into surrendering assets I had spent years building.<\/p>\n
But the worst discovery was still ahead.<\/p>\n
The day before the hearing, Amelia reviewed the latest financial analysis with me.<\/p>\n
She explained that we could submit the material through the proper court procedures and request that the judge consider the discrepancies before making decisions about the disputed assets.<\/p>\n
We organized the records into a clear timeline, supported by sworn statements and the underlying documents available to us.<\/p>\n
We did not include every suspicion or every private message. We focused on evidence relevant to the financial claims before the court.<\/p>\n
The documents were placed in a sealed brown envelope for submission under the court’s procedures.<\/p>\n
That was the envelope I carried into the Atlanta courtroom.<\/p>\n
Now, ten minutes into the trial, Richard was still smiling.<\/p>\n
He had just finished explaining why he believed he deserved half of my company.<\/p>\n
My mother whispered something to Madison.<\/p>\n
They both laughed.<\/p>\n
I looked at them and felt something unexpected.<\/p>\n
Not rage.<\/p>\n
Not fear.<\/p>\n
Relief.<\/p>\n
For eleven months, I had worried that the truth would never be heard because the people involved had spent so much time shaping the story before I could respond.<\/p>\n
Now I had the opportunity to present the evidence.<\/p>\n
I stood.<\/p>\n
\u201cYour Honor, may I submit supplemental financial records and request that the court review them before ruling on the disputed property claims?\u201d<\/p>\n
Richard turned toward me.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat is she talking about?\u201d<\/p>\n
His attorney began to object, arguing that the documents had not been presented in the manner the defense expected.<\/p>\n
Judge Evelyn Carter looked over her glasses.<\/p>\n
\u201cCounsel, I will hear the basis for the request. If these materials are to be considered, the court will follow the applicable procedural requirements and give the opposing party an opportunity to respond.\u201d<\/p>\n
Amelia explained the nature of the records and identified the questions they raised.<\/p>\n
The judge reviewed the filing, then accepted the properly submitted materials for consideration.<\/p>\n
I opened my briefcase, removed the brown envelope, and handed the relevant packet to the court clerk.<\/p>\n
\u201cYour Honor,\u201d I said quietly, \u201cplease take another look.\u201d<\/p>\n
The courtroom fell silent.<\/p>\n
Judge Carter began reading.<\/p>\n
At first, her expression remained neutral.<\/p>\n
Then she turned to the financial timeline.<\/p>\n
She examined the disputed agreement, the records concerning the proposed holding company, and the correspondence showing that the trust had been discussed as a potential source of collateral.<\/p>\n
She paused at the page bearing the disputed signature.<\/p>\n
Richard stopped smiling.<\/p>\n
My mother leaned forward.<\/p>\n
Madison’s face grew pale.<\/p>\n
The judge looked at Richard.<\/p>\n
\u201cMr. Hayes, are you representing to this court that your wife signed this agreement?\u201d<\/p>\n
Richard cleared his throat.<\/p>\n
\u201cMy understanding is that the document was prepared as part of preliminary discussions.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat was not my question,\u201d Judge Carter replied. \u201cAre you asserting that this is her signature?\u201d<\/p>\n
He hesitated.<\/p>\n
\u201cI would need to review the original again.\u201d<\/p>\n
The judge turned another page.<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd are you also asserting that the proposed holding company was intended to own assets in which you now claim an interest?\u201d<\/p>\n
Richard shifted in his chair.<\/p>\n
\u201cYour Honor, those discussions were exploratory.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen why does your financial declaration describe the arrangement as an existing contribution to the company?\u201d<\/p>\n
For the first time since the trial began, Richard had no immediate answer.<\/p>\n
The judge set down the papers.<\/p>\n
Then she asked the question that changed everything.<\/p>\n
\u201cMr. Hayes, did you disclose to this court that you were involved in negotiations to transfer your wife’s business assets into a separate entity while simultaneously seeking an interest in those same assets in this divorce?\u201d<\/p>\n
The silence was absolute.<\/p>\n
Richard looked toward his attorney.<\/p>\n
His attorney looked at the documents.<\/p>\n
Neither answered immediately.<\/p>\n
Judge Carter’s expression hardened.<\/p>\n
\u201cI am not making a finding of fraud based on a question or an incomplete record. But this court will not proceed on financial representations that appear to be inconsistent without a proper explanation.\u201d<\/p>\n
She directed both legal teams to address the discrepancies through the appropriate process and ordered that the disputed financial claims not be resolved until the necessary evidence had been reviewed.<\/p>\n
Richard’s demand for an immediate ruling on my company was no longer moving forward as he had expected.<\/p>\n
But the hearing was only the beginning.<\/p>\n
Outside the courtroom, Richard caught up with me.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou had no right to ambush me with those documents.\u201d<\/p>\n
I turned toward him.<\/p>\n
\u201cThose are financial records relevant to the claims you brought against me.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou could have discussed them privately.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI tried discussing my concerns privately for months. You called me paranoid.\u201d<\/p>\n
His jaw tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou have no idea what you’re doing.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen you should have no trouble explaining the records.\u201d<\/p>\n
He stepped closer, lowering his voice.<\/p>\n
\u201cThink about what this will do to your family.\u201d<\/p>\n
I looked at him.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou thought about that when you were planning to take my company?\u201d<\/p>\n
He didn’t answer.<\/p>\n
My mother hurried toward us.<\/p>\n
\u201cVictoria, please,\u201d she said. \u201cWe can work this out as a family.\u201d<\/p>\n
I almost laughed.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou helped him prepare his financial claims.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI was trying to protect you.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFrom what? My own company?\u201d<\/p>\n
She looked away.<\/p>\n
Madison arrived moments later.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou’re going to destroy Richard’s career over paperwork?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo,\u201d I said. \u201cI’m asking the court to determine what the paperwork means.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou’ve always thought you were better than us because you made money.\u201d<\/p>\n
That was when I finally understood.<\/p>\n
They didn’t simply want a share of my business.<\/p>\n
They resented that I had built something they couldn’t control.<\/p>\n
For years, I had tried to keep everyone happy. I had paid for family holidays, helped my mother with expenses, and supported Madison when she struggled financially. I had convinced myself that generosity would protect our relationships.<\/p>\n
Instead, some of them had mistaken generosity for an obligation.<\/p>\n
And when I finally said no, they decided I needed to be punished.<\/p>\n
I walked away without another word.<\/p>\n
Over the following months, the financial review continued.<\/p>\n
The disputed signature was examined by a qualified document examiner. The examiner’s report identified inconsistencies and concluded that the signature could not reliably be attributed to me. That finding did not, by itself, establish who had placed it on the document or whether a crime had occurred.<\/p>\n
The forensic accountant also identified transfers that needed further explanation.<\/p>\n
Some were legitimate business expenses.<\/p>\n
Others were not supported by the records Richard had initially provided.<\/p>\n
A few transactions involved an entity connected to my mother, but the evidence did not establish that every payment was improper or that every family member knew the same things.<\/p>\n
The distinction mattered.<\/p>\n
Amelia insisted that we pursue only claims we could support.<\/p>\n
Meanwhile, the court examined the financial circumstances of our marriage, the history of my company, the trust’s governing documents, and the parties’ respective claims.<\/p>\n
The trust was not automatically immune from every possible divorce-related issue simply because my father had created it. But neither was Richard entitled to it merely because he demanded access.<\/p>\n
Its treatment depended on the trust’s terms, applicable law, and the evidence concerning its administration and any relevant transactions.<\/p>\n
My father’s estate attorney provided the trust documents and records establishing its structure. The court was able to distinguish the trust assets from the assets Richard was properly entitled to have considered in the divorce.<\/p>\n
Richard’s claim to half my company also became much more complicated.<\/p>\n
The company had existed before the marriage, and its ownership history was documented. The court considered the evidence regarding the company’s growth, marital contributions, and applicable property rules rather than accepting Richard’s proposed division at face value.<\/p>\n
I didn’t win simply because I had produced an envelope.<\/p>\n
I won ground because the records could be examined, challenged, and verified.<\/p>\n
That distinction was important to me.<\/p>\n
I had spent too much of my life watching people treat confidence as if it were proof.<\/p>\n
I wasn’t going to make the same mistake.<\/p>\n
The affair also became part of the divorce proceedings where relevant to the issues properly before the court. Richard eventually acknowledged his relationship with Lauren, although he continued to dispute parts of my account of how the financial plan had developed.<\/p>\n
Lauren was not automatically responsible for the financial claims simply because she had been involved in the affair. Her role in the proposed consulting arrangement was reviewed separately.<\/p>\n
My mother retained her own lawyer.<\/p>\n
Madison stopped returning my calls.<\/p>\n
The family that had smiled behind Richard in the courtroom was now divided, each person trying to explain what they had known, when they had known it, and what they had actually done.<\/p>\n
Nearly eight months after the first hearing, we returned to court.<\/p>\n
By then, the evidence had been reviewed, financial disclosures had been corrected, and the disputed transactions had been addressed through the legal process.<\/p>\n
Richard no longer entered the courtroom laughing.<\/p>\n
The court rejected his demand for half my company as presented. After considering the company’s ownership history, the applicable law, and the evidence, the final property settlement preserved my controlling ownership and did not grant him the share he had demanded.<\/p>\n
The court also declined to give him the access to my father’s trust that he had sought. The trust assets were handled according to the governing documents and the court’s findings.<\/p>\n
Other marital assets and obligations were resolved through the final judgment and settlement terms.<\/p>\n
The findings concerning the disputed agreement and financial disclosures were addressed through the proper channels. Any potential professional or legal consequences would depend on separate reviews and the applicable standards; the divorce judge did not simply revoke anyone’s license or declare every allegation proven.<\/p>\n
Richard’s professional reputation suffered when the financial inconsistencies became known to the relevant people involved in the proceedings. But I did not pursue rumors or attempt to ruin him through public accusations.<\/p>\n
I let the evidence speak where it could.<\/p>\n
When the judge finished explaining the court’s decision, I sat very still.<\/p>\n
For months, I had imagined that winning would feel like triumph.<\/p>\n
Instead, I felt exhausted.<\/p>\n
I had protected the company my employees depended on. I had preserved the trust my father had worked to establish. I had stopped the people closest to me from treating my silence as consent.<\/p>\n
But I had also lost a marriage, a sister’s trust, and much of the relationship I thought I had with my mother.<\/p>\n
There was no judgment that could return those things.<\/p>\n
Outside the courthouse, Richard approached me one last time.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou could have handled this differently,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
I looked at him.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou had months to be honest.\u201d<\/p>\n
He lowered his eyes.<\/p>\n
For a moment, I thought he might apologize.<\/p>\n
Instead, he said, \u201cI hope you understand what this has cost everyone.\u201d<\/p>\n
I thought of my employees, who had worried about the company’s future. I thought of my father, who had warned me not to sign away my independence simply because someone claimed to love me.<\/p>\n
Then I answered.<\/p>\n
\u201cI understand exactly what it cost me. That’s why I stopped letting other people decide what I should surrender.\u201d<\/p>\n
I walked away.<\/p>\n
Several weeks later, I visited my father’s grave.<\/p>\n
I brought no flowers at first. I simply stood there, thinking about the years I had spent trying to prove that I was worthy of my family’s approval.<\/p>\n
I had believed that if I worked hard enough, gave enough, and forgave enough, the people I loved would eventually respect my boundaries.<\/p>\n
I finally understood that love without respect could become another form of control.<\/p>\n
My father had not left me a perfect family.<\/p>\n
He had left me the opportunity to build a life on my own terms.<\/p>\n
The company continued to grow. I met with my leadership team, reassured my employees, and focused on the work that had mattered to me long before Richard entered my life.<\/p>\n
My mother sent a letter several months later.<\/p>\n
She admitted that she had shared financial information with Richard and had convinced herself she was helping the family reach a settlement. She did not accept responsibility for every disputed transaction, and I did not pretend that her letter answered every question.<\/p>\n
I told her I was willing to consider a relationship in the future, but it would have to be built on honesty and accountability.<\/p>\n
Madison did not apologize immediately.<\/p>\n
I stopped waiting for her to do so.<\/p>\n
For the first time in my adult life, I understood that I could love my family without allowing them unlimited access to my life.<\/p>\n
I kept the brown envelope in a drawer in my office\u2014not as a trophy, and not as a reminder of revenge.<\/p>\n
It reminded me of the moment I stopped begging people to believe me and started trusting the work I had done to establish the truth.<\/p>\n
People sometimes ask whether I regret exposing the documents in court.<\/p>\n
I don’t.<\/p>\n
I regret that the situation ever reached that point. I regret the years I spent confusing loyalty with silence. And I regret believing that the people closest to me would never use my trust against me.<\/p>\n
But I don’t regret standing up for myself.<\/p>\n
Because the most important thing I saved that day wasn’t a company worth $12 million.<\/p>\n
It was my right to decide what happened to the life I had built.<\/p>\n
And the question that silenced my husband in that courtroom was never really about one disputed document.<\/p>\n
It was about whether he believed he could demand everything from me while hiding the truth about his own actions.<\/p>\n
For the first time, he had to answer that question in a place where charm and confidence weren’t enough.<\/p>\n
He had to answer it with evidence.<\/p>\n
And I finally learned that I didn’t need to become cruel to become strong.<\/p>\n
I only needed to stop surrendering to people who mistook my kindness for weakness.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
My Lawyer Husband Demanded Half My $12 Million Company\u2014Then the Judge Opened My Envelope Ten minutes into my divorce trial, my husband laughed at me in front of a packed … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":226705,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-226709","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-honglay"],"brizy_media":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/honglay168.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226709","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/honglay168.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/honglay168.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/honglay168.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/honglay168.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=226709"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/honglay168.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226709\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":226710,"href":"https:\/\/honglay168.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226709\/revisions\/226710"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/honglay168.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/226705"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/honglay168.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=226709"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/honglay168.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=226709"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/honglay168.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=226709"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}